Teen Drivers: Get the Facts

Motor vehicle crashes are the second leading cause of death for U.S. teens.1 Teen motor vehicle crashes are preventable, and proven strategies can improve the safety of young drivers on the road.

How big is the problem?

In 2019, almost 2,400 teens in the United States aged 13–19 were killed1,2 and about 258,000 were treated in emergency departments for injuries suffered in motor vehicle crashes.1 That means that every day, about seven teens died due to motor vehicle crashes, and hundreds more were injured. In addition, motor vehicle crash deaths among teens 15–19 years of age resulted in about $4.8 billion in medical and work loss costs for crashes that occurred in 2018.1

Who is most at risk?

The risk of motor vehicle crashes is higher among teens aged 16–19 than among any other age group. In fact, per mile driven, teen drivers in this age group are nearly three times as likely as drivers aged 20 or older to be in a fatal crash.2

Teens who are at especially high risk for motor vehicle crashes are:

  • Males
    • In 2019, the motor vehicle death rate for male drivers aged 16–19 was over two times higher than the death rate for female drivers of the same age.2
  • Teens driving with teen or young adult passengers
    • The presence of teen or young adult passengers increases the crash risk of unsupervised teen drivers. This risk increases with each additional teen or young adult passenger.3,4
  • Newly licensed teens
    • Crash risk is particularly high during the first months of licensure.5–7 Data from the 2016–2017 National Household Travel Survey indicate that the crash rate per mile driven is about 1.5 times as highexternal icon for 16-year-old drivers as it is for 18–19-year-old drivers.2
Risk Factors

What factors can put teens at risk?

Inexperience:

  • Teens are more likely than older drivers to underestimate or not be able to recognize dangerous situations.8,9 Teens are also more likely than adults to make critical decision errors that can lead to serious crashes.10

Nighttime and Weekend Driving:

  • Nighttime driving is riskier than daytime driving for drivers of all ages but is particularly dangerous for teen drivers.
  • Data from the 2016–2017 National Household Travel Survey indicate that teen drivers aged 16–19 years were almost 3 times as likely to be involved in fatal nighttime crashes than adult drivers aged 30–59 years per mile driven.2
  • In 2019, 40% of motor vehicle crash deaths among teens aged 13–19 occurred between 9 pm and 6 am, and 52% occurred on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday.2

Not Using Seat Belts:

  • Compared with other age groups, teens and young adults often have the lowest seat belt use rates.11 For example, results from the National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS) Controlled Intersection study from 2016–2019 indicate that seat belt use in the front seat among teens and young adults (16–24 years of age) was approximately 87% each year, whereas seat belt use among adults (25 years of age or older) in the front seat was about 90% or higher for each year during the same period.11
  • In 2019, 43.1% of U.S. high school students did not always wear a seat belt when riding in a car driven by someone else.12
  • Among teen drivers and passengers 16–19 years of age who died in car crashes in 2019, almost half were unrestrained at the time of the crash (when restraint use was known).2

Distracted Driving:

  • Distraction negatively effects driving performance for all drivers but can be especially dangerous for young, inexperienced drivers.
  • Results from the 2019 national Youth Risk Behavior Survey revealed that, among U.S. high school students who drove, 39.0% texted or e-mailed while driving at least once during the 30 days before the survey.12

Speeding:

  • Teens are more likely than older drivers to speed and allow shorter headways (the distance from the front of one vehicle to the front of the next).13
  • In 2019, 31% of male drivers aged 15–20 years and 17% of female drivers aged 15–20 years who were involved in fatal crashes were speeding.14

Alcohol Use:

  • Drinking any amount of alcohol before driving increases crash risk among teen drivers.2,15 Teen drivers have a much higher risk for being involved in a crash than older drivers at the same blood alcohol concentration (BAC), even at BAC levels below the legal limit for adults.15
  • Results from the 2019 national Youth Risk Behavior Survey12 revealed the following:
    • Among U.S. high school students who drove, 5.4% drove when they had been drinking alcohol at least once during the 30 days before the survey.12
    • Driving after drinking alcohol was higher among students who were older, male, Hispanic, or had lower grades.12
    • 16.7% of U.S. high school students rode with a driver who had been drinking alcohol at least once during the 30 days before the survey.12
    • Riding with a drinking driver was higher among Hispanic students or students with lower grades.12
    • Students who engaged in any of the other transportation risk behaviors measured by the survey were approximately 3–13 times as likely to have also engaged in driving after drinking alcohol at least once during the 30 days before the survey.12
  • Drinking alcohol is illegal for people less than 21 years of age, as is driving after drinking any amount of alcohol. Despite this, in 2019, 24% of drivers aged 15–20 who were killed in fatal motor vehicle crashes had been drinking.14
  • In 2019, 15% of drivers aged 15–20 involved in fatal motor vehicle crashes had a BAC of 0.08% or higher – a level that is illegal for adults aged 21 or older in all U.S. states (Note: Utah has a BAC limit of 0.05%).14
  • In 2019, 60% of drivers aged 15–20 who were killed in motor vehicle crashes after drinking and driving were not wearing a seat belt (based on known restraint use).14
  • For young drivers involved in fatal crashes, alcohol involvement is typically higher among male drivers than among female drivers. In 2019, 20% of male drivers aged 15–20 years and 14% of female drivers aged 15–20 years involved in fatal crashes had been drinking prior to the crash.14

Drug/Substance Use:

  • Driving while impaired by any substance (including alcohol, marijuana, other illicit drugs, prescription medications, or over-the-counter medications) is dangerous and illegal.16,17
  • Many types of drugs/substances have the potential to impair a teen’s ability to drive safely.16
  • After alcohol, marijuana is the most common drug associated with impaired driving.16,18
  • Marijuana has negative effects on judgment, motor coordination, decision-making, and reaction time—all of which are important skills for safe driving.16,19–21
  • Regardless of age, acute cannabis intoxication has been associated with an increased risk for motor vehicle crashes.20–22
  • Results from the national Youth Risk Behavior Survey revealed that in 2017, among U.S. high school students who drove, about 13% drove when they had been using marijuana during the 30 days before the survey.23,24
  • Risk for motor vehicle crashes appears to be higher when driving after using both marijuana and alcohol as compared with driving after using either marijuana by itself or alcohol by itself.25–27
Prevention
Buckle up. Every Person. Every Time. www.cdc.gov/parentsaretheykey

Eight Danger Zones

Parents: Make sure you and your young driver are aware of the leading causes of teen crashes and injuries:

  1. Driver inexperience
  2. Driving with teen passengers
  3. Nighttime driving
  4. Not using seat belts
  5. Distracted driving
  6. Drowsy driving
  7. Reckless driving
  8. Impaired driving

There are proven methods to help teens become safer drivers. Learn what research has demonstrated that parents can do to keep teen drivers safe from these risks.

Seat Belts Save Lives

At least 48% of teen drivers and passengers aged 16–19 years who died in passenger vehicle crashes in 2019 were not wearing a seat belt at the time of the crash.2 Research indicates that seat belts reduce serious crash-related injuries and deaths by about halfexternal icon.28

Primary Enforcement of Seat Belt Laws

States vary in their enforcement of seat belt laws. A primary enforcement seat belt law allows police officers to ticket drivers or passengers for not wearing a seat belt, even if this is the only violation that has occurred. A secondary enforcement seat belt law allows police officers to ticket drivers or passengers for not wearing a seat belt only if they have pulled over the driver for another reason. Some states have secondary enforcement seat belt laws for adults but have primary enforcement seat belt laws for young drivers. Seat belt use among all age groups is consistently higher in states with primary enforcement seat belt laws than in states with secondary enforcement seat belt laws.29–31 Visit the seat belt and child seat laws by state webpageexternal icon on the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s website for up-to-date information on seat belt laws by state, including the type of enforcement, who is covered, and which seating positions are covered.32 CDC also recently published state-specific fact sheets that provide a snapshot of motor vehicle occupant deaths and seat belt use, as well as an overview of proven strategies for increasing the use of seat belts, car seats, and booster seats. Additionally, you can use CDC’s Motor Vehicle Prioritizing Interventions and Cost Calculator for States (MV PICCS) to learn about how many lives could be saved, injuries prevented, and costs averted if your state were to implement a primary enforcement seat belt law.33

Not Drinking & Driving Prevents Crashes

Maintaining and enforcing minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) laws and zero tolerance laws for drivers under age 21 is recommended to help prevent drinking and driving among young drivers.34–36

Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) Systems Reduce Fatal Crashes

Driving is a complex skill, one that must be practiced to be learned well. Teenagers’ lack of driving experience, together with risk-taking behavior, heightens their risk for crashes. The need for skill-building and driving supervision for new drivers is the basis for graduated driver licensing (GDL) systems. Although varied, GDL systems exist in all U.S. states and Washington, D.C. GDL systems provide longer practice periods, limit driving under high-risk conditions for newly licensed drivers, and require greater participation from parents as their teens learn to drive. Research indicates that GDL systems are associated with reductions of about 19% for injury crashes and about 21% for fatal crashes for 16-year-olds.37 Current GDL research has frequently focused on exploring how many teens are delaying licensure, characteristics of teens who are more likely to delay licensure, and whether teens who delay licensure might be missing out on important benefits of GDL because they are aging out of the GDL systems in their states.38–42

Parents can help their teens be safer by knowing and following their state’s GDL laws. Check out GDL laws by stateexternal icon on the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s website to learn more about your state’s GDL laws.

CDC’s GDL Planning Guide can assist states in assessing, developing, and implementing actionable plans to strengthen GDL practices. CDC’s new State-Specific Fact Sheets on Costs of Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths contain recommendations of proven strategies for each state, including recommendations that could strengthen each state’s GDL system.

Additional Resources

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC). WISQARS (Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; July 2020. Available at: www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html. Accessed 7 September 2021.
  2. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Fatality Facts 2019: Teenagers. Highway Loss Data Institute; March 2021. Available at: www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/teenagersexternal icon. Accessed 7 September 2021.
  3. Tefft BC, Williams AF, Grabowski JG. Teen driver risk in relation to age and number of passengers, United States, 2007–2010external icon. Traffic Inj Prev 2013;14(3):283–292. doi:10.1080/15389588.2012.708887
  4. Ouimet MC, Pradhan AK, Brooks-Russell A, Ehsani JP, Berbiche D, Simons-Morton BG. Young Drivers and Their Passengers: A Systematic Review of Epidemiological Studies on Crash Riskexternal icon. J Adolesc Health 2015;57(1 Suppl):S24–35. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.03.010
  5. Mayhew DR, Simpson HM, Pak A. Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of drivingexternal icon. Accid Anal Prev 2003;35(5):683–691. doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00047-7
  6. McCartt AT, Shabanova VI, Leaf WA. Driving experience, crashes and traffic citations of teenage beginning driversexternal icon. Accid Anal Prev 2003;35(3):311–320. doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00006-4
  7. Gershon P, Ehsani JP, Zhu C, Sita KR, Klauer S, Dingus T, Simons-Morton B. Crash Risk and Risky Driving Behavior Among Adolescents During Learner and Independent Driving Periodsexternal icon. J Adolesc Health 2018;63(5):568–574. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.04.012
  8. McKnight AJ, McKnight AS. Young novice drivers: careless or clueless?external icon. Accid Anal Prev 2003;35(6):921–925. doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00100-8
  9. Lee SE, Klauer SG, Olsen ECB, Simons-Morton BG, Dingus TA, Ramsey DJ, Ouimet MC. Detection of Road Hazards by Novice Teen and Experienced Adult Driversexternal icon. Transp Res Rec 2008;2078:26–32. doi:10.3141/2078-04
  10. McDonald CC, Curry AE, Kandadai V, Sommers MS, Winston FK. Comparison of teen and adult driver crash scenarios in a nationally representative sample of serious crashesexternal icon. Accid Anal Prev 2014;72:302–308. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.016
  11. Enriquez J. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Occupant Restraint Use in 2019: Results From the NOPUS Controlled Intersection Study (Report No. DOT HS 812 992). U.S. Department of Transportation; October 2020. Available at: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812992external icon. Accessed 7 September 2021.
  12. Yellman MA, Bryan L, Sauber-Schatz EK, Brener N. Transportation Risk Behaviors Among High School Students — Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2019. MMWR Suppl 2020;69(Suppl-1):77–83. doi:10.15585/mmwr.su6901a9
  13. Simons-Morton B, Lerner N, Singer J. The observed effects of teenage passengers on the risky driving behavior of teenage driversexternal icon. Accid Anal Prev 2005;37(6):973–982. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.014
  14. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic Safety Facts 2019: Young Drivers (Report No. DOT HS 813 130). U.S. Department of Transportation; June 2021. Available at: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/813130external icon. Accessed 7 September 2021.
  15. Voas RB, Torres P, Romano E, Lacey JH. Alcohol-related risk of driver fatalities: an update using 2007 dataexternal icon. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2012;73(3):341–350. doi:10.15288/jsad.2012.73.341
  16. National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Drugged Driving DrugFacts. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; December 2019. Available at: www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/drugged-drivingexternal icon. Accessed 8 September 2021.
  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC). Drug-Impaired Driving in the United States – Fact Sheet. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; December 2020. Available at: www.cdc.gov/transportationsafety/pdf/Drug-Impaired-Driving-Summary-Sheet-LD-508.pdfpdf icon. Accessed 8 September 2021.
  18. Azofeifa A, Rexach-Guzmán BD, Hagemeyer AN, Rudd RA, Sauber-Schatz EK. Driving Under the Influence of Marijuana and Illicit Drugs Among Persons Aged ≥16 Years — United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68(50):1153–1157. Published 2019 Dec 20. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6850a1
  19. National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Marijuana Research Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; July 2020. Available at: www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/marijuana/what-marijuanaexternal icon. Accessed 8 September 2021.
  20. Compton RP. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Marijuana-Impaired Driving – A Report to Congress (Report No. DOT HS 812 440). U.S. Department of Transportation; July 2017. Available at: www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/812440-marijuana-impaired-driving-report-to-congress.pdfpdf iconexternal icon. Accessed 8 September 2021.
  21. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research. 2017. Available at: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24625/the-health-effects-of-cannabis-and-cannabinoids-the-current-stateexternal icon. Accessed 8 September 2021. doi:10.17226/24625
  22. McCartney D, Arkell TR, Irwin C, McGregor IS. Determining the magnitude and duration of acute Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC)-induced driving and cognitive impairment: A systematic and meta-analytic reviewexternal icon. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2021;126:175–193. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.01.003
  23. Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, Shanklin SL, Flint KH, Queen B, Lowry R, Chyen D, Whittle L, Thornton J, Lim C, Bradford D, Yamakawa Y, Leon M, Brener N, Ethier KA. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance — United States, 2017. MMWR Surveill Summ 2018;67(No. SS-8):1–114. doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1
  24. Li L, Hu G, Schwebel DC, Zhu M. Analysis of US Teen Driving After Using Marijuana, 2017external icon. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3(12):e2030473. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30473
  25. Bondallaz P, Favrat B, Chtioui H, Fornari E, Maeder P, Giroud C. Cannabis and its effects on driving skillsexternal icon. Forensic Sci Int 2016;268:92–102.
  26. Hartman RL, Huestis MA. Cannabis effects on driving skillsexternal icon. Clin Chem 2013;59(3):478–492. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2012.194381
  27. Downey LA, King R, Papafotiou K, Swann P, Ogden E, Boorman M, Stough C. The effects of cannabis and alcohol on simulated driving: Influences of dose and experienceexternal icon. Accid Anal Prev 2013;50:879–886. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.07.016
  28. Kahane CJ. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Lives saved by vehicle safety technologies and associated Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, 1960 to 2012 – Passenger cars and LTVs – With reviews of 26 FMVSS and the effectiveness of their associated safety technologies in reducing fatalities, injuries, and crashes (Report No. DOT HS 812 069). U.S. Department of Transportation; January 2015. Available at: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812069external icon. Accessed 7 September 2021.
  29. Venkatraman V, Richard CM, Magee K, Johnson K. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Countermeasures that work: A highway safety countermeasures guide for State Highway Safety Offices, 10th edition, 2020 (Report No. DOT HS 813 097). U.S. Department of Transportation; July 2021. Available at: www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/2021-09/15100_Countermeasures10th_080621_v5_tag.pdfpdf iconexternal icon. Accessed 7 September 2021.
  30. Nichols JL, Tippetts AS, Fell JC, Auld-Owens A, Wiliszowski CH, Haseltine PW, Eichelberger A. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Strategies to Increase Seat Belt Use: An Analysis of Levels of Fines and the Type of Law (Report No. DOT HS 811 413). U.S. Department of Transportation; November 2010. Available at: www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/811413.pdfpdf iconexternal icon. Accessed 7 September 2021.
  31. Nichols JL, Tippetts AS, Fell JC, Eichelberger AH, Haseltine PW. The Effects of Primary Enforcement Laws and Fine Levels on Seat Belt Usage in the United Statesexternal icon. Traffic Inj Prev 2014;15(6):640–644. doi:10.1080/15389588.2013.857017
  32. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Seat belt and child seat laws by state. Highway Loss Data Institute; September 2021. Available at: https://www.iihs.org/topics/seat-belts/seat-belt-law-tableexternal icon. Accessed 7 September 2021.
  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC). Motor Vehicle Prioritizing Interventions and Cost Calculator for States (MV PICCS). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; November 2020. Available at: www.cdc.gov/transportationsafety/calculator/index.html. Accessed 7 September 2021.
  34. Fell JC, Scherer M, Thomas S, Voas RB. Assessing the Impact of Twenty Underage Drinking Lawsexternal icon. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2016;77(2):249–260. doi:10.15288/jsad.2016.77.249
  35. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). Getting to Zero Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities: A Comprehensive Approach to a Persistent Problem. The National Academies Press; 2018. Available at: www.nap.edu/catalog/24951/getting-to-zero-alcohol-impaired-driving-fatalities-a-comprehensive-approachexternal icon. Accessed 7 September 2021.
  36. Alderman EM, Johnston BD; Committee on Adolescence; Council on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention. American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statement – The Teen Driverexternal icon. Pediatrics 2018;142(4):e20182163. doi:10.1542/peds.2018-2163
  37. Masten SV, Thomas FD, Korbelak KT, Peck RC, Blomberg RD. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Meta-Analysis of Graduated Driver Licensing Laws (Report No. DOT HS 812 211). U.S. Department of Transportation; November 2015. Available at: www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/812211-metaanalysisgdllaws.pdfpdf iconexternal icon. Accessed 7 September 2021.
  38. Williams AF. Graduated driver licensing (GDL) in the United States in 2016: A literature review and commentaryexternal icon. J Safety Res 2017;63:29–41. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.010
  39. Curry AE, Metzger KB, Williams AF, Tefft BC. Comparison of older and younger novice driver crash rates: Informing the need for extended Graduated Driver Licensing restrictionsexternal icon. Accid Anal Prev 2017;108:66–73. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.015
  40. Vaca FE, Li K, Tewahade S, Fell JC, Haynie DL, Simons-Morton BG, Romano E. Factors Contributing to Delay in Driving Licensure Among U.S. High School Students and Young Adultsexternal icon. J Adolesc Health 2021;68(1):191–198. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.003
  41. Vaca FE, Li K, Fell JC, Haynie DL, Simons-Morton B, Romano E. Associations between Graduated Driver Licensing restrictions and delay in driving licensure among U.S. high school studentsexternal icon. J Transp Health 2021;21:101068. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2021.101068
  42. Vaca FE, Li K, Gao X, Zagnoli K, Wang H, Haynie DL, Fell JC, Simons-Morton B, Romano E. Time to licensure for driving among U.S. teens: Survival analysis of interval-censored survey dataexternal icon. Traffic Inj Prev 2021;22(6):431–436. doi:10.1080/15389588.2021.1939871